Search for: "State v. Fair" Results 6761 - 6780 of 27,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
The real victory is that we now have a return to at least some level of common sense, justice and fairness in this state. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, time spent commuting to and from the workplace is generally not compensable. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:49 am by Roy Black
He won Bush v Gore and Citizens United. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:13 pm
 Non-discrimination between "similarly situated" licencees is fundamental (see Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711). [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury that was finally empaneled found Murray guilty, and he then filed a habeas petition claiming the state criminal court violated his constitutional rights in denying him a fair jury. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 5:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
A second case in the Court’s new term — which officially opens on Monday, October 3 — also places free and fair elections in the United States in grave peril. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
West Virginia: Court Sustains Jury’s Valuation Award Excluding Marketability and Minority Discounts Under Stock Redemption Agreement’s Fair Market Value Standard Tri-State Petroleum Corp. v Coyne, 814 S.E.2d 205 [Sup. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:16 am
■ First up, a tale of wasteful spending courtesy of co-blogger Bob V. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:39 pm
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This means that if the federal judges (who interpret the Constitution every day) know in their heart of hearts that the defendant did not get a fair trial, they have to sustain the conviction if "fairminded jurists could disagree" about the state court's proper application of constitutional precedent.The case is Matthews v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
If §75 charges of misconduct "would, if proved in a court of law constitute a crime,” the 18-month statute of limitations for bringing such charges does not applyHanlon v New York State Police, 2015 NY Slip Op 08315, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentChristian Hanlon was served with disciplinary charges pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. [read post]