Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 6761 - 6780 of 10,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am by Suzanne Ito
• The ACLU's Amy Fettig condemned the use of solitary confinement in the United States in her testimony to the U.N. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes explains the rhetorical power of Lochner v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
United States Department of Defense, docket number 09-2375. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
Incidence of Acute, Symptomatic Hepatitis A – United States, 1980-2008 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 9:25 am by Christina Burnett
An earlier article examined alien land laws in the United States, telling the story of Oyama v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by Mike Hanzel
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
DoD Press Release, here, announces: The Department of Defense announced today that the convening authority, Office of Military Commissions, referred charges to a military commission in the case of “United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In a 2010 ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Philadelphia, said a judge could require the authorities to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before demanding cellphone records or location information from a provider. [read post]