Search for: "Does 1 - 10" Results 661 - 680 of 47,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am by Florian Mueller
A renegotiated license agreement is my best guess.Finally, here's the amended complaint: 14-10-03 Amended Microsoft v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am by Charon QC
That argument does not appeal to me in the least. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:31 am by Jacob Sapochnick
This notice is effective 1/18/10 and shall be without effect at the end of one year after 1/18/10. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
D13 does not disclose such a mirror. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 11:38 am
NLRB Law Memo 10/03/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 of the main request does not explicitly reflect the technical effect of “prevention of bone loss”. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:58 am by David Oscar Markus
One set of assumptions gives a chance of about 1 in 50 million. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 6:55 am by Michael Geist
As I noted, the bill does no such thing, though the CRTC will be able to establish regulatory exemptions once it conducts extensive hearings on implementing the legislation should it pass (prior posts in the Broadcasting Act Blunder series include Day 1: Why there is no Canadian Content Crisis, Day 2: What the Government Doesn’t Say About Creating a “Level Playing Field”, Day 3: Minister Guilbeault Says Bill C-10 Contains Economic Thresholds That Limit… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm by Sheppard Mullin
App. 5(b) as amended by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961); Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities (10 CFR part 810); Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material (10 CFR part 110); International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR parts 120 through 130); Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 734); regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (31 CFR parts 500 through 598); DOE Order 142.3A, Unclassified Foreign… [read post]