Search for: "Does 15-96" Results 661 - 680 of 997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm by Ken
NFL (9th Cir. 1980) 634 F2d 1197, 1202 [monetary harm alone does not constitute irreparable harm]. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm by Amit Shah
A CPO that does not qualify for the de minimus exemption under Regulation 4.13(a)(3) (pools that have less than 15 participants and aggregate capital contributions do not exceed $400,000) may be eligible for other exemptions. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Super. 2010), appeal granted, 15 A.3d 429 (Pa. 2011); Viguers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am by Vikram Raghavan
Broadly, as the Supreme Court narrates, “[o]n February 15, 2012, an (sic) First Information Report was lodged at Neendakara Coastal Police Station by one Fredy, owner of the Indian registered fishing boat St. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Giesela Ruehl
However, since Article 2 (1) was subject to the remaining provisions of the Brussels I-Regulation, including Article 67, which provides that the Brussels I-Regulation does not prejudice the application of provisions governing jurisdiction in specific matters, which are to be found in Community instruments or in national legislation implementing such instruments the court relied on Section 8 of the Posted Workers Act (now: Section 15 of the Revised Posted Workers Act) to find that… [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver
In support of its arguments the [patent proprietor] cited the decisions T 479/00 and T 870/96. [5.5.2] The Board notes that the patent in suit is concerned with stable aqueous particle dispersions (paragraphs [0001] and [0007] of the patent in suit). [read post]
13 May 2012, 7:23 am by Steven Eversole
Barring any unforeseen circumstances, his client would be 96 when  he is eligible for release. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:00 pm
Barring any unforeseen circumstances, his client would be 96 when  he is eligible for release. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
Defendant does not dispute that he signed three written waivers of his Miranda rights. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The retroactive effect of a decision dismissing the appeal does not alter the pending status of the application. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The following explanations refer to the situation at the time of the alleged publication of documents I1 to I4 i.e. between 15 November 1999 and 31 January 2000. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The premise underlying the doctrine of mutual mistake is that "the agreement as expressed, in some material respect, does not represent the meeting of the minds of the parties". [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
The premise underlying the doctrine of mutual mistake is that "the agreement as expressed, in some material respect, does not represent the meeting of the minds of the parties". [read post]