Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
In Bardales v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Although a defamatory publication is actionable without proof of either intention or special damage in English law it must be shown that a “substantial tort” has been committed (see and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859). [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
Although the German principle of deliberate selection or the US disclosure-dedication doctrine have not entered into English patent law, the Court is scrutinizing the language of the specification with renewed vigor following Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
USCIS, Sept. 4, 2024 - "This notice is to tell you about a proposed Settlement Agreement of a class action lawsuit, J.O.P. et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
LawPundit has reorganized the list for English-language purposes and has added the official English translations (as available at the respective online pages) - as well as the appropriate links to those pages - and has expanded the language key to include: lv = Latvian language, en = English language, fr = French language, de = German language, ru = Russian language, thus also adding some French and German language pages which Alliks does not mention, since these are few. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:59 am
(in English) The Grand Chamber judgment in the Naït-Liman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
Last year, in a case called McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Gross in Plain English. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
As far as we are aware, this is the first example of a purely “private” intervention in a private law case in the English courts. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
Coakley, followed by oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:31 am
California, followed by United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:23 am
For example, in the case of Maldonado v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
