Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 661 - 680 of 14,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court held in 1918 that  “there is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed … [T]he right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:00 am by Alexandre Miura
 Although IP lawyers may avoid tax law matters, some just can't be avoided. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
Back in December 2006 [that's right, this matter started with a trade mark application filed nearly nine years ago], the word mark BGW Bundesverband der deutschen Gesundheitswirtschaft (the 'long mark') was registered in Germany for various goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 41 and 43. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Rachel Bessette
[T]he new electoral law failed to herald a transition to meaningful party-based politics. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:43 am by velvel
July 8, 2009Re: The Vast Amount That We Don’t Know About The Madoff Matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:38 am
Klickitat Valley Chianina, LLC, Serial No. 76715490 (March 16, 2017) [not precedential] (opinion by Judge Shaw).The Board observed that "more evidence is required where a mark is so highly descriptive that purchasers seeing the matter in relation to the named good would be less likely to believe that it indicates source in any one party. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
’AG Wahl advised the CJEU to answer the questions referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék as follows:(1) [Answering questions 1 and 2, correctly in this Kat's view] For the purposes of Article 4(3) ... [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
In bygone times, when Court of First Instance (now General Court) rulings on Community trade mark matters were not as plentiful as strawberries at Wimbledon, the IPKat used to report a good many of them. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
But, as Applicant argued, this is an I-T-U application and the record did not establish that Applicant will not use the mark on a series of creative works.Therefore this "single work" claim was also a loser.TTABlog comment: On the same day as this decision, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the alleged mark CRITTERS FOR COMPANY for children's books on the ground that the phrase was merely the title of a single work. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
According to T 834/09, the librarian receiving the publication was already part of the public. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:45 pm
" Likewise of no import were the facts that Mellbeck was not represented by an attorney, and had no prior experience in United States trademark matters. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am by Susan Hennessey
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement over the weekend: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 28 MAY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
But I say Sinex doesn't really speak to the issue of whether it's relative or absolute values that matter in determining what's "substantial. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:15 pm by admin
Our Austin business law firm assists clients with registering a trademark, trademark infringement litigation, and other intellectual property matters. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  These reasons include: the claimed matter is functional, meaning it affects the cost or quality of the product or service; the claimed matter is merely descriptive, meaning that consumers don’t understand that it indicates source and instead think that it just describes some characteristic of the product; the claimed matter is deceptively misdescriptive, which is like descriptiveness except not true; the claimed matter is deceptive; the… [read post]