Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 661 - 680 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm by Adam Feldman
These data can be parsed somewhat differently when senators are separated by state. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
McConnell drafted a bill that included a $2k stimulus check and a repeal of Section 230, but it never got a vote. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:55 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Archivado en: Educación, Noticia destacada, NOTICIAS, Transmisiones 20122, VÍDEOS [read post]