Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 661 - 680
of 732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
This year, I publicly challenged Will Baude and Michael McConnell to a debate on Section 3! [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Not content with those spoils, Mitch McConnell and the GOP-controlled Senate have played hardball to gain still further advantage. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The timing of when the Senate will act on Ratcliffe’s nomination is entirely up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who could choose—or be persuaded by the president—to sit on the nomination. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm
” The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
Oh, important conservatives cracked now and then--Judge Bork waffled on Griswold and Professor McConnell wrote a stunningly honest attempt at an originalist justification of Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 3:29 am
While the Supreme Court’s recent holding in NLRB v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
True, originalist scholars sometimes look to post-ratification materials for insight into the original public meaning (McConnell, for instance). [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
The states’ leadership had changed from Democratic to Republican. [read post]
