Search for: "Miller v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 2,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”  A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm by CAFE
Wade,” Ruth Marcus, Washington Post op-ed, 4/24/20 NY Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
United States, the court will consider whether the federal indictment against Capitol Riot defendant Joseph Fischer substantiates a charge under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The state had previously attempted to execute him by lethal injection in 2022.With Miller’s death, this country has now executed 1,600 people since the United States Supreme Court revived capital punishment in its 1976 Gregg v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:02 pm
Adkins; Professor Miller’s comments; Supreme Court on the March; Supreme Court docket sheet. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:47 pm
"  According to one newspaper of the day, the Act sought to provide territorial inhabitants the "immunities and privileges of citizens of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
UPDATE: The D.C. government's motion for a stay indicates that an appeal to the Supreme Court would include these questions: "(1) whether the [Circuit Court] panel decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]