Search for: "People v. King" Results 661 - 680 of 2,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2007, 1:40 am
Peter Collins KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice'Type-O' Obviously Oversight, Does Not Necessarily Render Accusatory Instrument Fatally Defective People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DeJesus KINGS COUNTYTorts Prior Assault Ruled Dissimilar in Nature, Did Not Put Department on Notice of Future Misconduct Abadia v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:04 am
Dwayne Christie KINGS COUNTYInsurance LawDefendant's Failure to Include Pleadings Rendered Summary Judgment Motion Procedurally Defective Lewis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The R (Bridges) v South Wales Police case A key test case on the use of FRS has been heard by the Administrative Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
New York State Division of Parole KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Officer Directed to Appear for Futher EBT on Issue Of Disciplinary, Civilian Complaint Records Butler v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
Beatrice Davis KINGS COUNTYTrusts and Estates Consideration Believed to Be Too Low, Not Basis To Vacate Otherwise Proper Stipulation Estate of Paul Saviano QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Knowingly, Voluntarily, Intelligently Waived Right to Jury Trial, Right to Testify People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
Pedro Rosario KINGS COUNTYTorts Plaintiff Fails to Offer Valid Excuse for Delay In Filing of Substantially Late Notice of Claim Woolward v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Louie Garcia NEW YORK COUNTYFamily LawMotion to Close Courtroom for Hearing To Vacate Child's Adoption Is Denied Matter of Doe KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeStrangulation Is Uncommon Brutality; Depraved Indifference Charge Stands People v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, the proper inquiry is whether a ban on gun shows at the county fairgrounds substantially burdens the right to keep and to bear arms; not whether a county can ban all people from carrying firearms on all of its property for any purpose....Where, as here, government restricts the distribution of a constitutionally protected good or service, courts typically ask whether the restriction leaves open sufficient alternative avenues for obtaining the good or service. [read post]