Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 661 - 680 of 3,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2018, 1:35 am by Edward Smith
However, accidents often leave people with fatal injuries. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Marks tells all.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
  A provision added by Proposition 59 states:  “The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business, and, therefore, . [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Goken CEO, Doug Smith (`Smith’), gave Bandepalya access to the entire `Admin’ folder on his Goken laptop because it would have been logistically difficult to give Bandepalya restricted access to just the `Business Development’ subfolder. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by admin
   “This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Smith (Criminal Jurisdiction; Indian Pueblo Land Act Amendments of 2005) United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Alfred Brophy
 Even before Smith, Aubrey Strode, the lawyer for the state in Buck v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]