Search for: "People v. Jackson" Results 661 - 680 of 2,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Jackson wrote this line in the last paragraph of his dissenting opinion in a free speech case called Terminiello v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 9:34 am by familoo
Don’t secretly record your children in the hope you will win your case, people. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the defendant’s trial counsel's failure to timely move to suppress evidence pursuant to Payton did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel, since the motion was not warranted by the facts and his counsel otherwise provided meaningful representation, as held in the cases of People v Howard; People v Jackson; and People v Coats. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
 The prohibition on killing potential people trumped the lives of existing people. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 3:30 am by Linda C. McClain
Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization returned the issue of abortion to “the people and their elected representatives,” appeals to conscience and religion to challenge abortion bans have become more visible. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
’”The court rightly recognized the limits of its own authority in matters of clemency and that the authority over clemency rests with the people.It is the people’s responsibility to ensure that the clemency power does not fall into what Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson once called “irresponsible and unscrupulous hands. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by Philip Thomas
On Tuesday a unanimous Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a 2009 $1 million Hinds County premises liability verdict in Wackenhut v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 12:28 pm by Mary Ziegler
Jackson, the respect and evenhandedness that defined Casey and its progeny might be a thing of the past. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, politicians and pundits went public with a parade of horribles – from the criminalization of contraceptives to the reversal of Brown v. [read post]