Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 661 - 680 of 3,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Alfred Brophy
 Even before Smith, Aubrey Strode, the lawyer for the state in Buck v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Marks tells all.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Goken CEO, Doug Smith (`Smith’), gave Bandepalya access to the entire `Admin’ folder on his Goken laptop because it would have been logistically difficult to give Bandepalya restricted access to just the `Business Development’ subfolder. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Smith (Criminal Jurisdiction; Indian Pueblo Land Act Amendments of 2005) United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Smith (Assimilative Crimes Act; Indian Country Crimes Act)Kim R. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about the case a year ago, and now there’s an appellate court decision in it, People v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
  Which makes sense, and I agree is required by Rule 11.P.S. - Looks to me like there's confusion about dates in Judge Smith's opinion. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]