Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:10 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
As Wurman and Fredrickson write, the Court concluded “that the law treated people differently based on race because it prohibited marriage based on the race of the other party to the marriage. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:39 am
A few lawyers have told me the view this as a Marbury v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Superior Court (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 92, 99; see also Landry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
Superior Court (1987). [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Superior Court, 157 P.3d 1017, 1022 (Cal. 2007) (emphasis added), one would reasonably expect that the California definition was categorically broader than the definition at common law, which requires a "substantial step towards committing the crime," United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Superior Court, 137 S.Ct. 1773 (June 19, 2017). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:06 am
Superior Court, Forsyth County. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:28 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
In Liu v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Much ink has already been spilled about the MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
The lower court, however, found that U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
So, the court denied discovery and let the superior court take the next step, to dismiss the class action (most likely).The case is Starbucks v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:29 am
King, and R. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 11:02 am
Supreme Court in Burke v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Jarkesy, and why I believe it’s a bigger deal than most people seem to think. [read post]
