Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
But in Bruen, the Court went further to require any gun licensing regime to give citizens a right to meet objective criteria to carry a gun in public. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:53 am
From the DOJ’s positions in the various cases, the administration’s public statements, and the decisions of the several courts, the separation of powers is experiencing a historical tension. [1] A.A.R.P., et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:53 am
From the DOJ’s positions in the various cases, the administration’s public statements, and the decisions of the several courts, the separation of powers is experiencing a historical tension. [1] A.A.R.P., et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
Buentello v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
EVANS et al.No. 94-1039.Argued Oct. 10, 1995.Decided May 20, 1996.517 U.S. 620, 116 S.Ct. 1620[Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94-1039.ZO.html] Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court.One century ago, the first Justice Harlan admonished this Court that the Constitution “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm
Sharpe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
” Justice Jackson’s much cited concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard… [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:11 am
Later this month the justices will hear arguments in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:20 am
See SpaceX v. [read post]
Another attorney's fees case begs an important question: does the fee-shifting process add anything?
28 Jul 2010, 8:11 pm
Disputes over attorney's fees merely add additional and avoidable burdens to the already overburdened judiciary (and don't forget, the Justice Department and their clients, too.) [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
Staff support for the Task Force shall be provided by the Division of Criminal Justice Services, the Division of Budget, the Department of Health, the Office for Technology, and the Executive Chamber. 2. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
Shaman examines Justice Scalia’s use of originalism in his opinions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Virginia, holding that federal law barred racial segregation in interstate public transportation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Karlan a Stanford law professor currently working at the Department of Justice. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:37 pm
Bond v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
Al-Kidd v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
The main precedent on which the Court relies is a FOIA case, United States Department of Justice v. [read post]
