Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 9,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
True law nerds know that we all get to kick off every new year with the annual end-of-year report from the Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to certify a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 11:22 am by Marcia Shein
In May 2018, Chief Roberts of the United States Supreme Court wrote a unanimous opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
United States largely avoids the big constitutional issue that was the original focus of the case: the scope of the treaty power. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm by John Stigi
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, applying the reasoning in its own decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
United Consulting Engineers, Inc.; United Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Rebecca Bratspies
  Few New Yorkers have even heard of the Macomb family, or the outsized role they played in New York and United States history. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Takara, Senior Airman (E-4), United States Air Force, Petitioners v. [read post]