Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 7,737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 9:18 am by Kristin Johnson
Supreme Court just announced that it will weigh in on this case, Vidal v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit issued a ruling on November 14, 2016 that encouraged small business owners all over the country. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit issued a ruling on November 14, 2016 that encouraged small business owners all over the country. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:11 am
As an initial matter, we reiterate that the number of designated persons located within the United States appears to be very small. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Because the federal government has defined the “waters of the United States” to include wetlands. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied Microsoft Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:28 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by NL
She argued that Article 8 imposed on the State a positive obligation to facilitate the gypsy way of life (Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, BAILII: [2001] ECHR 43, ECHR 2001 I and Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, BAILII: [2004] ECHR 223, 27 May 2004) and in granting such a wide-ranging injunction the authorities were acting in violation of this obligation. 21. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:06 am by Viking
Federalevidence blog notes the case of United States v. [read post]