Search for: "State v. Michael S. Johnson" Results 661 - 680 of 886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
The Guidelines language defining “crime of violence” in §4B1.2(a)(2) is the same language found unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
  Romney lost the Republican nomination to Nixon, and Goldwater lost the election to Johnson. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The BBC stated that Croxall’s remarks and lack of challenge to opinions expressed by programme guests meant that there was a significant risk that the audience would “infer an editorial position on the part of the BBC. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Most notably, he served for more than a year as lead technology consultant to the major tobacco companies in United States of America v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The court’s verdict – firm and detailed – would have demonstrated to our sovereign how shamelessly the tsar’s officials had been exceeding the limits of legality and trampling personal dignity.Indeed, the Great reforms of 1860s-1870s were to promote new legal boundaries between state, subject, and society. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
Last week’s decision in State v. [read post]