Search for: "US v. Coats" Results 661 - 680 of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
Currently, according to the FDA, PFAS are authorized for the following general categories of food contact uses: Non-stick cookware: PFAS may be used as a coating to make cookware non-stick. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am by Isobel Williams
It reminds us of the Lady Jane Wellesley episode in your agonisingly documented romantic life. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am by Conrad B. Wilton
  The Ninth Circuit affirmed this decision citing the principles set forth in Satava v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm by Jordan Brunner
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in IRAP v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
We tend to overlook the other cases that also impact our lives and could result in your being thrown in the slammer.The case is Utah v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
Ron Coleman (not surprisingly) and Stephen Coates would affirm the CAFC’s decision in Tam. [read post]