Search for: "United States v. North Carolina"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Finally, North Carolina allows for advisory opinions based on judicial initiative (see Rogers and Vanberg 2002). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently gave a highly significant ruling in the case of Hurlburt v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
United States (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn the Matter of the Adoption of B.B. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
United States (Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn the Matter of the Adoption of B.B. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
In Harwood v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
McDowell was prosecuted under the South Carolina statute and convicted. [4]. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
Evans (2002), North Carolina argued that Utah lacked standing to sue to challenge the denial of a House seat that the President had allocated to North Carolina. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
§ 1983 suit from the Eastern District of North Carolina, the plaintiff was a pretrial detainee in custody of the Wake County Sheriff. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:26 am
In the 2018 case, Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
But rounding out the top five for outmigration were New York, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and California—not, with the exception of South Carolina, a list of low-tax locales. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
” After the Court handed down its decision in Shelby County, Texas and North Carolina swiftly enacted voter identification laws that restrict voting for some individuals. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Barr v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm
United States, that the Fourth Amendment applies to cell phone company records that detail a cell phone user’s location and movements. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
In 2016, the plaintiffs, political and nonprofit organizations, filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, claiming that the TCPA (§227(b)(1)(A)(iii)) violated the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:04 pm
He filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Justice and Freedom Fund, Institute for Faith and Family and North Carolina School Choice in support of the petitioners in Espinoza v. [read post]
