Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
Windsor analysis. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:16 pm
Windsor f/k/a Bank v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Since the US Supreme Court gave its decision in US v Windsor on 26 June 2013, five states (Utah, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, and Michigan) have struck down bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am
At Inter Alia, the online companion to the Yale Law and Policy Review, Brian Christopher Jones uses United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
In the case, Windsor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
In the case, Windsor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Windsor, United States Supreme Court 6/26/13)Click here to review the Justia summary and read commentary on these two decisions.Voting RightsShelby County v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
Supreme Court Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2011] UKSC 41 (27 July 2011) Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 (27 July 2011) Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40 (27 July 2011) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 42 (27 July 2011) Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Newspaper Licensing… [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
The first Virginia case after the landmark U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:35 am
This notion of allowing the difficult matter to be worked out in the political process... she won't make a connection. *** In my Constitutional Law II exam last spring, written before the Supreme Court's decision in Windsor, I began a question this way (boldface added): Here’s a section from one of the briefs in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 8:00 am
" Attachment: Brief: Windsor v United States Amicus NY State [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:20 pm
Windsor embraced the power of the states to define for themselves who may marry. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
Windsor, which struck down the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman. [read post]
