Search for: "A B"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 158,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
Does Rule 60(b)(5) permit shifting the burden to the non-moving party to justify the original judgment? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
§ 441a(a)(3)(B), as applied to contributions to national party committees and facially, and b. the limit on contributions to candidate committees at 2 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:50 am
WAVE Life Sciences has announced (pdf) it has secured $66 million in series B preferred stock financing. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 1:29 pm
Clearly, he should have received a few 1099-B’s en route. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Hospitals could hire an outside physician to administer Plan B. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:53 pm
David B. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
USCIS and D&B have now announced a streamlined process for proactively updating a company's business data before a petition is filed. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
USCIS and D&B have now announced a streamlined process for proactively updating a company's business data before a petition is filed. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
We hold that it does.This is a civil case, but the interpretation of FRE 606(b) will control in federal criminal cases as well and will be persuasive authority in states with similar rules. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:12 pm
Takeaway: Invalidation under the on-sale bar of § 102(b) usually involves a sale of the patentee's product. [read post]
14 May 2013, 5:15 pm
Adam B. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:29 pm
The 'Heinrich Böll Stiftung' - the political foundation affiliated with the German green party - is having its annual foreign policy conference next week, on September 11th and 12th. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm
Here's a litigation tip/reminder from Tort Talk:The Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence differentiate between the proper scope of cross-examination for non-party witnesses versus party witnesses.Section 611(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence provides, in pertinent part, as follows:(b) Scope of cross-examination. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:06 am
Attorneys Jo Ann Hoffman and Vance B. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The court's opinion, written by Associate Justice David B. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:19 am
N.J.R.E. 701 states that “[i]f a witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness’ testimony in the form of opinions or inferences may be admitted if it (a) is rationally based on the perception of the witness and (b) will assist in understanding the witness’ testimony or in determining a fact in issue. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
It may also be that in some cases it is impossible or impractical to order reinstatement of the wrongfully discharged employee who otherwise satisfies one or more pre-requisites of the reinstatement remedy in section 79(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
It may also be that in some cases it is impossible or impractical to order reinstatement of the wrongfully discharged employee who otherwise satisfies one or more pre-requisites of the reinstatement remedy in section 79(2)(b) of the Act. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:45 am
Honestly I tend to be for as little oversight of our markets and institutions as possible, but if something is going to pass, let’s hope it includes the provision in the House bill that permanently exempts smaller public companies from auditor attestation of the adequacy of their internal financial controls under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
The District Court let them do this under FRCP 6(b) calling the neglect excusable. [read post]
