Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 32,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 3:47 am
Although the recast does not entail radical changes, it is not confined to minor editorial amendments either, but adds some distinct new features to the EIR. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:10 am
Instead, it can be the most empowered decision you ever make for yourself. 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
(1) NOTICE: It very important that an injured worker notify their supervisor or employer as soon as possible after an on-the-job accident occures. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
T 511/92).As the overall context of document D0 does not allow the skilled person to understand without doubt which of the two figures is correct, the distinguishing feature cannot be considered to be unambiguously disclosed.Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 is novel within the meaning of A 54(1)(2) EPC 1973 over the disclosure of document D0.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
The claim does not require that this improvement be used in any way whatsoever. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:02 pm
The claim does not require that this improvement be used in any way whatsoever. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
You pretty much have two options: 1. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
Does the other spouse have to pay for their college or graduate program? [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:45 am
Claim 1: “about 40 wt % to about 60 wt % of a watersoluble polymeric matrix”; Claims 7 & 12: “about 48.2 wt % to about 58.6 wt %”; and Claim 8: “about 48.2 wt %”; The problem though is that the original specification does not recite any of these amounts or ranges directly. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:03 pm
If the parties married on January 1, 2001, and separated on January 2, 2001, it does not matter they they have been separated for more than 14 years. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
All of these guidelines assume that your company lacks a collective bargaining agreement. 1. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:01 am
Id. at § 8-102(30)(c). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Narita takes these holdings and applies them to e(8) claims. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:18 am
First, the rule does not apply to immediate relatives (i.e., children, spouses, and parents) of a United States citizen. 8 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
Dec. 26, 2013).Issues[1] Sidense first faults the district court for its reliance on our decision in MarcTec, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
Therefore, any F-1, J-1, or M-1 nonimmigrant who is under 18 years of age does not accrue unlawful presence, even if they failed to maintain their nonimmigrant status. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Does s. 753(1) preclude sentencing judges from considering future treatment prospects before designating an offender as dangerous? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
§ 1. 550 U.S. at 551. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
He then focuses on the statutory scheme of the RTI and argues that Section 8 (1) (j) provides for a good compromise. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:25 pm
As of June 30, 2016, we have closed more than $1 billion of EB-5 financing for our clients, and sourced more than $700 million for their projects. [read post]
