Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 29,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 4:29 am
In an op-ed for The Advocate, Alex Morash looks at the efforts of the Alliance Defending Freedom, a legal advocacy group that last term successfully represented the Colorado baker who refused to make a custom cake for a same-sex wedding, “to find and push cases toward the Supreme Court to chip away at civil rights laws. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:07 pm
Moments later, defendant's vehicle came back and defendant again stared at the complainant. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
New York, 691 F.2d 1070, 1086 (2d Cir. 1982) (explaining that "when facts or opinions found in historical materials or secondary sources are disputed, it is error to accept the data (however authentic) as evidence" and that the "better course is to conduct an evidentiary hearing"). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:18 pm
In re The Vill. at Lakeridge, 814 F.3d 993, 1005. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
Supreme Court, where [Bill] Cosby [is] looking to defend ‘long-standing principles’ making it tougher for celebrities to sue” for defamation. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:40 pm
In re The Vill. at Lakeridge, 814 F.3d 993, 1005. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
Corley, 273 F.3d [429,] 450 [2d Cir. 2001]. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am
” Thus, “[i]f a plaintiff’s genuinely held, subjective belief of potential retaliation from reporting her harassment appears to be well-founded, and a jury could find that this belief is objectively reasonable, the trial court should not find that the defendant has proven the second Faragher-Ellerth element as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 5:24 am
. 'Want to profit of[f] your meme? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Tannhauser, 2018 BCPC 183 [1] [Defendant] is charged with using an electronic device while driving a vehicle on August 17, 2017 contrary to section 214.2(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. [2] His defence is that he was not using the device within the meaning of the legislation as its use was neutralized by a disabling device installed by his national employer on its phone it had provided to [Defendant] for his use while he was engaged in his employment. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:29 pm
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014) (“Newman”). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:29 pm
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014) (“Newman”). [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:41 pm
Williams, 630 F.3d 563 (7th Cir. 2010)). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Concepts, Inc., 638 F.3d 1137, 1151 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am
Matal, 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:45 am
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 242 F. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
’” Gross, 817 F.3d at 178, citing Concepcion, 563 U.S. at 342, 131 S.Ct. 1740. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
The record shows that Sisca signed the retainer agreement with decedent on behalf of defendant, which agreement identified Peter F. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
When the defendant sought rehearing, Judge Wardlaw was assigned to the case in Judge Reinhardt's place, but he signed the original opinion, which turned out to be one of his last. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
When the defendant sought rehearing, Judge Wardlaw was assigned to the case in Judge Reinhardt's place, but he signed the original opinion, which turned out to be one of his last. [read post]
