Search for: "Doe 3" Results 6781 - 6800 of 193,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 8:01 am by Len Feltoon
This resolves a lot of problems in the marketplace. 3. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
However, [the director’s cancellation of her schedule] does not rise to the sufficiently outrageous standard required for recovery under IIED[.] [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 9:36 am
Alimony does not have to be paid over a fixed period of time or a constant amount each period. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 (2006): (1) whether the defendant was represented by competent counsel, (2) whether the defendant was misled, coerced, mistreated, or unfairly taken advantage of, and (3) whether the plea was fairly and understandingly made.The KSC provided guidance for the application of these factors in presentence withdrawal requests:The Edgar factors remain viable benchmarks for judicial discretion but reliance on them to the exclusion of other factors has not only… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:25 pm by IP Dragon
Having not altered the work, performance, or audio-visual recording provided to the service object;3. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
(2) Does the statute bar suits in connection with injuries sustained by third parties not directly treated by the EMS workers? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:18 pm by Virginia Hunt
 A  persistent low back strain does not entitle an injured worker to a permanent partial disability award if the MRI does not show a herniated disc greater than 3mm. 3. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:50 pm
” The proposed legislation says that within 120 days after enactment, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be required to amend the Code of Federal Regulations, so that law prohibits application to amateur service communications of any private land use restriction, including a restrictive covenant, that– 1 precludes such communications; 2 fails to reasonably accommodate such communications; or 3 does not constitute the minimum practicable restriction on… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:03 pm by Michael Walsh
The court in Brown unanimously held that: 1)  Strict products liability for defect design does not apply to prescription drugs, 2)  Strict liability for failure to warn in prescription drug cases is limited to information that was reasonably scientifically known or knowable at the time of distribution, and 3)  The market share theory applied in Sindell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:30 am by Denise Sze
Generally, an insurance agent does not have a duty to suggest an insured should purchase additional or a different type of coverage.1What this means is an insurance agent does not owe a duty to the insured to: recommend additional coverage; purchase for the insured any additional coverage that is not specifically requested; or advise that any particular type of coverage is available. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:16 pm by Rob McKinney
Under Rule 11 (c)(3)(A) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure a trial court has the authority gives the trial court the authority to accept to accept or reject a plea agreement. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by David S. Jones
For example, Australians can qualify for E-3 visas, while Singaporean and Chileans can qualify for H-1B1 visas. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:00 am
Of course, this general description does not cover all the aspects that need to be agreed on and people might find that they signed a document they did not fully understand. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:43 pm by Glenn Reynolds
“A bigger-than-expected bailout for Ireland — does anybody expect Portugal or Spain (or Italy) to do any better? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:53 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Here is a blog clinic question from Paul who is a tenant: Hi I have major problems with my 3 bed house 2 of my bedrooms ceiling leaks when it rains and I have a damp problem in my kitchen lounge and my bedroom. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:34 am
Department of Labor (DOL) issued Administrator's Interpretation No. 2010-2, Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. [read post]