Search for: "In re A. V." Results 6781 - 6800 of 62,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am by husovec
The law in question includes no mention of such systems or re-use of data and consequently offers no safeguards. [read post]
Torres then brought suit against the state under the Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
On his War Room podcast, Bannon proposed in May: “It’s going to be a fight, but this is a fight that must be won, we don’t have an option,” “We’re going to take this back village by village … precinct by precinct. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 10:48 pm by GWS Law
Significant costs, and much valuable court time, is taken up re-arguing identical points of principle in costs litigation due to the absence of a binding authority. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him: “Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:52 pm by Daniel
Possession with intent to sell indicates that you’re willing to do more than hurt yourself; you’re willing to hurt others. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:52 pm by Daniel
Possession with intent to sell indicates that you’re willing to do more than hurt yourself; you’re willing to hurt others. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If you buy gas in Oregon, Washington has no claim on that transaction even if you’re a Washington resident. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
Trial lawyers, read pp 4-5 discussing why the Martins’ new argument was not barred by res judicata. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm by NARF
(Indian Child Welfare Act; Parental Rights) Sipp v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Supreme Court, which can decide whether it wants to re-affirm Roe v. [read post]