Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 6781 - 6800 of 11,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
In that vein, the dissent cites Justice Thomas’ anti-230 Malwarebytes statement SIX TIMES. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
Justice Clarence Thomas concurred only in the judgment, striking his own separate path as is often the case. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
 Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in two Fourth Amendment cases involving the scope of the rules used to implement that provisions’ protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
The third approach to the phenomenon of such games was that of Justice Clarence Thomas, who wrote a dissent speaking only for himself. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:48 am by Mark Keenan
Key cases, such as Thomas v Thomas [1995] 2 FLR 668, established that courts have the discretion to make orders affecting trusts in divorce settlements. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm by Ilya Somin
None of this matters much if you think universities should be given broad discretion to use racial preferences, so long as it is for seemingly good motives. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
In both cases, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 11:23 am by Ilya Somin
Whether we are talking about guns, speech, or other rights, there are going to be cases where, as a practical matter, it is impossible to prevent death by measures short of restricting the right itself. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:01 pm
Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. 2008 WL 2404077 (pdf), which not surprisingly (see prior post) restricted the stamp tax exemption only to postconfirmation transfers, the Court based its decision in large measure on the particular subchapter of the Bankruptcy Code in which §1146(a) is located (i.e., "Subchapter III - Postconfirmation Matters"). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The criticism stems from expensive trips taken years ago by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. underwritten by wealthy business executives and not disclosed in required annual financial reports. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:33 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Our Law Office can provide experienced attorney representation for criminal matters. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
The precise moment at which "substantive due process" crystallized as a distinct doctrine is a matter of some debate. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
” Determining primary purpose is, of course, a very tricky matter, as Justice Thomas emphasized in his dissent in Davis and repeats here. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, with respect to Count I, Defendants argue that tracking Troeckler’s vehicle did not constitute a private matter or private fact. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
So, in both Elonis and Abercrombie & Fitch, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito each had a different take from one another. [read post]