Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 12,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
For instance, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm
United States Department Of Homeland Security. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:49 am
See American Dental Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
As readers of this blog know, we have been following the case of Marcia Fuller French, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The first Justice Harlan’s statement of this nondelegation doctrine in Field v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:14 am
(f) The following requirements apply to situations in which expertise is relied upon as part of a disadvantaged owner’s contribution to acquire ownership: (1) The owner’s expertise must be— (i) In a specialized field; (ii) Of outstanding quality; (iii) In areas critical to the firm’s operations; (iv) Indispensable to the firm’s potential success; (v) Specific to the type of work the firm performs; and (vi) Documented in the records of the firm. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am
[Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
In addition it seems clear that incremental inventions in the pharmaceutical field are being found invalid for inventive step. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:15 am
United States…. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* The UPC and Investor–State Arbitration The creation of a unitary patent title and a common court (‘UPC’) to litigate patent infringement in Europe raises, among other things, questions of international IP law. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
This is C5's first sortie into this field and the Kat wishes it well. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:43 pm
Folta v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
So let's take a look at Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm
Rippey v State Rippey filed a petition for post-conviction relief. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 1:52 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:55 pm
In today’s case (Davidge v. [read post]
