Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 21,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 7:39 am
Servs. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm
Where there is no such term, force majeure is governed by Section 56.In Indian law, under Section 56, as held in Satyabrata Ghose v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm
Where there is no such term, force majeure is governed by Section 56.In Indian law, under Section 56, as held in Satyabrata Ghose v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
Executive Coach Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
To encourage consistency across the site and make the sales process as easy as possible for consumers, Amazon encourages sellers to use pre-existing generic ASINs (or Amazon Standard Identification Numbers) where possible.A recent IPEC case, Jadebray & Noa and Nani v Clarke-Coles [2017] EWHC 1400 considered whether this reuse could constitute trade mark infringement and passing off in certain circumstances.What happened? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies illegally process their personal information. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Stockade Companies, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
It would overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
The Murr family are the plaintiffs in Murr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:27 am
Additional Resources: Adamian v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
" Eidos Display, LLC et al v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
While noting that it is for the referring court to make a determination in the specific case at hand, the AG stated that to this end "the referring court should carry out an overall assessment, taking into account the graphic representation and any descriptions filed at the time of application for registration, as well as other material relevant to identifying the essential characteristics of the contested mark, where applicable. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
See Harbour Properties, Inc v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:44 pm
Yang Seyfarth Synopsis: Last month in Mendoza v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
