Search for: "State v. David." Results 6781 - 6800 of 14,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am by NCC Staff
CLOSING CREDITS Today’s show was engineered by David Stotz and produced by Ugonna Eze. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by S2KM Limited
Chief Justice Roberts provided the deciding vote in the case titled National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Relatedly, David French, says he is voting for Harris "to try to save conservatism. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
While an earlier version of the case was pending before the Supreme Court in 2005, President Bush issued a memorandum stating he would meet the treaty obligations by “having state courts give effect” to the World Court ruling.But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the command, ruling that the state’s limits on successive habeas applications took precedence.As the case Medellin v Texas made its way back to the high court last… [read post]