Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6801 - 6820 of 9,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am by Rittgers and Rittgers
Vega — in which the Ohio Supreme Court held that a defendant in an OVI case may not attack the general reliability and validity of breath taking instruments — still applies. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:48 am by Colin O'Keefe
 Providing readers with useful insights into developments, activity and trends surrounding the form I-9 and E-Verify, the publication is already off to a strong start, including a post on Arizona’s immigration laws going before the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
Miranda the Supreme Court ruled that a waiver of the right to remain silent must be knowing and intelligent. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:49 pm by Ed Driscoll
FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE CRULLERS, AND I DID NOT SPEAK OUT: More on Massachusetts’ idiotic upcoming ban on school bake sales from blogger and businessman Matt Holzmann: The media and the Left were stunned when several of the Supreme Court Justices asked very basic questions about the Constitutionality of both the Health Care Bill and the case of United States versus Arizona on the enforcement of immigration law. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:25 am by alicia.baker
 Part III builds on the prior two points and analyzes the Johnson Amendment in light of the recent Supreme Court cases of Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm by Patrick G. Lee
“The idea is to reduce the negative impact that the process can have on a family,” Texas Supreme Court Judge Debra Lehrman told NLJ. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Joe Palazzolo
iStock Tipping their hand: Supreme Court justices on Wednesday challenged the Obama administration’s assertions that Arizona exceeded its powers by directing police officers to check the immigration status of people they stop, suggesting that at least part of the state’s effort to push out illegal immigrants could pass constitutional scrutiny. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:22 pm by Polly J. Price
While we await the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:00 pm
The passage of Prop 8 reverses In Re Marriage Cases, the California Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage in the state this past June. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:33 pm by Bill Raftery
The change in age could have a big impact in the Buckeye State: The Ohio Supreme Court says nearly 40 percent of judges in Ohio are age 60 or older. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:25 am by alicia.baker
 Part III builds on the prior two points and analyzes the Johnson Amendment in light of the recent Supreme Court cases of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Brian Kelsey Pleads Guilty to Two Federal Charges in Campaign Conspiracy” by Melissa Brown (Tennessean) for Yahoo News Elections Arizona: “Maricopa County Says Printer Glitches Didn’t Prevent Anyone from Voting” by Yvonne Wingett Sanchez and Isaac Stanley-Becker (Washington Post) for MSN Georgia: “Lindsey Graham Testifies Before Georgia Grand Jury in Election Probe” by Holly Bailey and Matthew Brown (Washington Post) for MSN Ethics National:… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:19 pm by Mike Aylward
The Virginia opinion is in accord with several other recent state or local bar ethics opinions, including Formal Opinion 2010-3 of the New York City Bar Association and Opinion 2010-154 of the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:21 pm
Lamb of Valorem Law Group at his blog, In Search of Perfect Client Service Scheduling Events When Divorced - Ontario attorney Brian Galbraith on his Ontario Family Law Blog Obviousness at the Supreme Court: Bilski Oral Arguments - Illinois lawyer R. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 11:10 pm
"The complete list, with comments, is here.If you can't see the intuitive appeal in not butchering our language, there may be a practical reason to pay attention to the list as well: The University once received a letter from an Arizona Supreme Court justice who said he posted that year's list on a bulletin board and prohibited all attorneys from using those words. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:26 am by Tony Mauro
Book winners were: William Coleman, Counsel for the Situation; Clare Cushman, Courtwatchers: Eyewitness Accounts in Supreme Court History; and William Stuntz, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. [read post]