Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 6801 - 6820 of 29,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 12:47 am by JR Chaves
Sé que el panorama se presenta negro, por lo que tomo unos párrafos de la arenga del general Eisenhower antes de la intervención en Normandía, que fue decisiva para la segunda Guerra Mundial, sobre lo que nos espera en nuestra cruzada por la Justicia administrativa: Vuestra tarea no será fácil  Vuestro enemigo esta bien entrenado, bien equipado y curtido en el combate. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:32 pm
See Tie Tech, 296 F.3d at 783; see also Talking Rain, 349 F.3d at 603. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 10:36 am by Richard Hunt
Hermanson Family, Ltd., 264 F.3d 999 (10th Cir.2001), which we will explore in another blog. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:42 am by Jeffrey Carr
It reads: (a) Except as provided by Subsections (b), (e), (f), (g), and (h) and without necessity of request by the tenant, a dwelling must be equipped with: (1) a window latch on each exterior window of the dwelling; (2) a doorknob lock or keyed dead bolt on each exterior door; (3) a sliding door pin lock on each exterior sliding glass door of the dwelling; (4) a sliding door handle latch or a sliding door security bar on each exterior sliding glass door of the… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Caroline R. Nichols, Esq.
 (f)        The association may require the unit owner to:  Comply with bona fide safety requirements, consistent with applicable building codes or recognized safety standards, for the protection of persons and property. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 7:14 am by Tim Sitzmann
Sportswear, Inc., 872 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2017). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:03 am by Will Baude
See 994 F.3d at 1120 ("[W]e think that private defendants, at least those invoking ex parte prejudgment statutes, should not be held liable under § 1983 absent a showing of malice and evidence that they either knew or should have known of the statute's constitutional infirmity. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:29 am by Docket Navigator
"Plaintiff asks this Court to recognize the nature of Defendant’s business – facilitating communication over the web, in every state including Nevada – and to limit the application of [In re Cray, 871 F.3d 1355 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
Should an attorney be required to inform a defendant about the effects of the plea on the defendant’s eligibility to vote in the future? [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN1]Defendant responds that he has provided full disclosure but, in any event, is willing to supplement that disclosure (Def Aff ¶¶ 11-12, citing Def Exh F). [read post]