Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 6801 - 6820 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm by Toni Guarino
  It seems ludicrous, but according to the US Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:04 pm by Mike Sykuta
Wright 24 Financial-market contracting, by Dean V. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:08 am by Kara OBrien
The following post is the first in what will be a monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner, LLP. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Phelps (tort liability arising from protest at military funeral) Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Adam Wagner
Last week saw a decision of Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Below the Second Amendment, interest quickly peters out until you reach the Tenth. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
  These include an award of  Aus$268,000 (£160,000) to a surgeon for a “breast job libel” (Haertsch v Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 182) and an award totalling Aus$615,000 (£370,000) for multiple libels to two plaintiffs (Megna v Marshall [2010] NSWSC 686). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:50 am
 More details of Peter Groves' splendid initiative here. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
The latest (v. 35 no. 2) issue of the Journal of Supreme Court History has another article on Justice Harlan, albeit one in a very light vein. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by VMaryAbraham
v=tZFbDY3-eG4 [Photo Credit: dsb nola] [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:33 am by Paul Caron
New York Times op-ed, One Nation, Two Deficits, by Peter Orszag (Director, Office of Management and Budget, 2009-10): The nation faces a nasty dual deficit problem: a painful jobs deficit in the near term and an unsustainable budget deficit over the medium and long term. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 6:10 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: CAFC: Disclosure that merely allows PHOSITA to ‘envision’ the claimed invention fails written description: Goeddel v Sugano (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) Evista (Raloxifene) – US: CAFC upholds decision against Teva: Eli Lilly & Co v Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc (Patent Docs) (The IP Factor) Aranesp (Darbepoetin) – EU: ECJ says ‘no’ to Kirin Amgen,… [read post]