Search for: "Power-One, Inc." Results 6801 - 6820 of 11,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 511 F.3d 974, 985 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (“In a class action, standing is satisfied if at least one named plaintiff meets the requirements. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  Moreover, at least one court found that suggestive Facebook posts may not violate non-solicitation covenants. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
  Moreover, at least one court found that suggestive Facebook posts may not violate non-solicitation covenants. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:44 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal. 2d 57, made it easier for injured parties to recover for products that cause injury to them. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:46 pm by John W. Arden
While the duration of a monopoly may be "one measure" in determining whether a defendant possessed monopoly power, it is not dispositive. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Stevedoring Servs. of Am., Inc., 697 F.3d 820 (9th Cir. 2012): An en banc Ninth Circuit took a bite out of the Director’s litigating power when it published Price. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 4:13 am by John L. Welch
In re Infinity Wind Power, Inc., Serial Nos. 77572712 and 77575965(December 11, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:34 pm by Bill Marler
This is what one of my clients had in her arm for weeks as she fought Listeria from cheese with powerful antibiotics: [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
Plaintiff was working on a construction project in which town houses were being built by the defendant Wildflower Estate Developers, Inc., the owner of the property, which acted as its own general contractor. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:19 pm by News Desk
Eldon Roth, the entrepreneur and inventor of the beef product, had even opened his Beef Products Inc. up to the industry-critical documentary makers who produced “Food Inc. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
  One approach would be to impose one policy approach randomly on some members of the population, but not on others, to determine whether the policy meets its goals. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 11:46 am by Chris Jaglowitz
  This decision is a dangerous one that uses a sledgehammer to fix a problem easily solved with a flyswatter. [read post]