Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 6801 - 6820
of 41,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 8:05 am
State Farm, and its own case of Levine v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Clooney v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:10 am
Defendant moved to decertify the class in 2013 based on the United States Supreme Court opinions in Dukes and Comcast together with two recent Tenth Circuit opinions vacating class certification orders in similar oil and gas royalty cases: Wallace B. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In Weeks v State of New York, 198 AD2d 615, the court held that the statute of limitations begins to run when the decision is served on the employee, not from the date on which the union received its copy. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:54 am
The underlying state offenses of battery or assault had elements of violence under the force clause of 16(a) and not the residual clause of 16(b). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:14 am
Bommai v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:18 am
§ 1396[a][25][B]). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Introduction B. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
The judgments are Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Haigh [2011] EWHC B16 (Fam) and Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Watson [2011] EWHC B15 (Fam). [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:17 am
Zillow wins on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:19 am
” Alluding to Hamdan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
B-K Lighting v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
However, it would appear to be insufficient on the strength of this judgement for a Court to ignore new evidence at the warrant stage and to state, for example, that the main proportionality issues had been dealt with in the course of the possession claim.Jarnea and others v Romania (31/5/12)The applicants were owners of properties which had been let to tenants under agreements concluded with the State. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 7:25 pm
In Tipaldo v. [read post]
