Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 6821 - 6840 of 13,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In the present case R 20 EPC 1973 rather than R 22 EPC applies according to Article 7 of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 (OJ EPO 2001, Special Edition No. 4, 50), Article 1(1) of the Decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 (OJ EPO 2007, Special Edition No. 1, 197) and Article 2 of the Decision of the Administrative Council of 7 December 2006 amending… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Ass’n Internal Med. 1118 (2021); Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Luen Tang, “Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021,” 10 Publications 29 (2022). [4] Elizabeth Wager & Peter Williams, “Why and how do journals retract articles? [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
.: IND-71543-23 Charging documents and arraignment State of New York response to Trump request for a bill of particulars (May 16, 2023) Trump request for bill of particulars (April 27, 2023) Arraignment hearing transcript (April 4, 2023) Trump Indictment (indicted on March 30, 2023 released on April 4, 2023) and statement of facts (April 4, 2023) Order on media access to Trump arraignment (April 3, 2023) Motions to Dismiss State of New York sur-reply in opposition to Trump omnibus motions (Nov. 27,… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[28]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[29]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[30] … [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
“[W]ith respect to the argument of State necessity,” he said, “the common law does not understand that kind of reasoning”. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Consistory courts – a cautionary note In Re St Gregory Sudbury [2022] ECC SEI 2, Gau Ch commenced his judgment with advice to the Petitioners which is likely to be of general applicability: “[1]. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 2:44 am by SHG
In retrospect, it looks pretty simple:  (1) find a convenient time for 1Ls, (2) provide pizza, (3) invite successful lawyers to talk about their careers, (4) have law faculty gently moderate, and (5) implement a modest attendence requirement tied to a 1L substantive course.Why does this matter? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Kordowski: “£50 and again that is an indication of someone telling the truth” Mr Justice Tugendhat: “What does he get for the £50? [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 2:42 pm by Josh Blackman
And even if one does not do that, more than a few readers might very well suspect that you have done so. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
”[1] “Judges commonly are elderly men, and are more likely to hate at sight any analysis to which they are not accustomed, and which disturbs repose of mind … . [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:05 am
Section 9(1) of the Act reads- Stay of legal proceedings [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:58 am by FDABlog HPM
  The Federal Circuit denied that petition in a July 29, 2010 Order, but Judges Gajarsa and Dyk took the opportunity to lodge their complaints with the majority’s decision. [read post]