Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
Rather, her tenure reviewers simply were not convinced that the professor was showing promise as a scholar who would develop into a leading contributor in her field (Theidon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:58 am
This, if I may state the obvious, will help you determine how to re-align your firm for the duration. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
An English trial of Warren Hastings weighed heavily on the forging of the impeachment standard. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:15 pm
Read the judgment (in English) here. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:34 pm
A copy of the statement is available in English here. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court declared them unconstitutional 150 years later, today, thousands of Americans are locked up for failing to pay their debts to the state. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
A recent example of the court’s flexibility can be seen in Arnold J’s recent judgment in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:14 pm
In today’s case (Smusz v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Language: English; Location: Worldwide; Safety mode: Off. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:55 pm
That's because virtually the same question arose in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
WMATA will undoubtedly rely heavily on Lehman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
The district court could and should have weighed them in its Rule 26 analysis,” the court stated. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
It’s not Marbury v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
Both the English and French versions of this policy explicitly limit the scope of “political activity” to activities intended to incite a public official to “retain, oppose, or change” a law, policy or decision, i.e. one which already exists. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
In Friday’s Chan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
For the most part it shadows the structure of the 2013 Act, but does suggest some notable alternatives to aspects of the English legislation. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
. *** In E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
