Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 6821 - 6840 of 6,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2006, 9:00 am
Erie has called the charges "misguided" and blasted HUD for issuing an "inaccurate and inflammatory press release" without a fair hearing on a matter HUD has been looking into for five years. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:28 pm
  But attempting to implement a criticism, no matter how insightful, as a technique for positive analysis has its difficulties.If the "meaning" of a text is brought to it by the reader, then that meaning is limited by the reader's imagination. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 11:14 am
November 7, 2006Re: Honesty, History, And A College Of History And LawFrom: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
November 7, 2006Re: Honesty, History, And A College Of History And LawFrom: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 11:46 am
My own experience, both as a practitioner in the field as well as teacher/scholar, suggests that development work is equally well-considered as a matter of business, finance, rational choice theory, a peculiar species of foreign direct investment, and law and economics in the matter of how aid is provided, used, and its outcomes. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:30 pm
Comments are very important to every blog that accepts them and many of us of a "certain age" simply have a steep learning curve in all sorts of tech matters. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
" Id. at 2226 (emphasis in original).Rather than rehear the matter en banc, First agrees with the government that additional fact-finding is necessary. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 2:42 pm
The key sentence in this premature requiem for Karl Rove's political influence in the Republican Party is the last one, in which Rove states matter of factly that the fate of the conservative movement does not stand or fall on the results of the 2006 elections: "1938 was a huge wipeout for the Democrats -- do you think that was the end of the New Deal? [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
[T]his inquiry, as a matter of law, is independent of the motivations that led the inventors to the claimed invention. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 6:17 am
The DVDs, which will not only be available as DVDs, but will also be put on the internet by MSL for viewing by computer and will be made downloadable by iPods, should be available in a matter of weeks. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 2:51 am
Judge Tatum took the matter under advisement to allow for further briefing.] [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 11:09 pm
Carrie Johnson at the Washington Post has a wonderful article here discussing the effect of the statute of limitations on matters related to the AOL Investigation. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:15 pm
At the same time, I don't think that any of the courts involved handled the matter with the care for which we'd hope.Let's start with the district court, which conducted a hearing on plaintiffs' preliminary injunction motion on August 30 and 31. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:32 am
As an initial matter, we would like to apologize for our absence for the last month and a half. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
The posting is lengthy, as is perhaps inevitable if all these matters are to be discussed. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 8:16 am
This Court's exercise of subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims does not automatically imply that Plaintiff has stated a claim upon which the Court can grant relief. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
Member Schaumber also found it unnecessary to pass on these unfair labor practices found by his colleagues: Supervisor Margeret Johnson's alleged coercive interrogation and threat of job loss of employees Mullanix-Ackerman and Williams; Supervisor Denise Miller's alleged coercive interrogation of Mullanix-Ackerman; and Barroso's threatening employees with unspecified reprisals. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 10:08 am
The trial court improperly used the new "advisory" sentencing scheme, which is not subject to Blakely, but the Court of Appeals said that it did not matter. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 7:44 pm
  No one ever explains that a lawyer, no matter how greedy, doesn't make the award - a jury drawn from the general public that listens to all the evidence does. [read post]
14 Sep 2006, 5:23 am
Or, to put the matter harshly, but possibly truly, is it possible that our electorate is so stupid, or so biased, that it is regularly taken in by such people? [read post]