Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 6821 - 6840
of 7,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
2 (18% of the votes) f. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
In re Tash, Serial Nos. 76577156 and 76566157 (April 18, 2008) [not precedential].Section 2(e)(5) bars trademark registration of functional matter. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Apotex Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 927848, at *12-13, 15-16 (3d Cir. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:43 pm
Legitimate grounds include:(1) Consent of the user for the search engine provider to use specified data for a specified purpose (Data Protection Directive Art. 7(a));(2) Necessary for the performance of a contract (Data Protection Directive Art. 7(b)) – however, the Working Party expressly rejected any argument that users enter into a de facto contractual relationship when using services offered by a search engine… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:43 am
E. 2nd 726 (Ohio Ct. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:18 pm
For further insight into confidentiality in federal courts, see Deason, Ellen E., "Predictable Mediation Confidentiality in the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
Granting deference to the agency’s own analysis of com-peting scientific data or expert opinions, the court held that NMFS did not ignore information in the administrative re-cord. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 11:47 am
§§ 1806(e), 1825(f). [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
" In re Sealed Case, 310 F.3d 717, 732 (Foreign Int. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
Importantly, the Act does not specify that such clinicians must be forensic experts, and suggests a risk assessment may still be made even if the offender does not cooperate fully (or at all) in the examination process.Section 8 outlines what these assessment reports must entail: (a) whether the 'offender has a propensity to commit relevant offences in the future'; (b) their 'pattern and progression' of sexual offending, and the 'nature of any likely future sexual… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
., 834 F.2d 510 (5th Cir.1987); State ex rel. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Counsel for both sides acknowledged receiving the e-mail. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:40 am
[e]: The duration of the marriage. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Tom Kane at Legal Marketing Blog.com says you’re making a big mistake if you’re not interviewing your clients. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:41 am
See eg In re Dentrell, 403 F.3d 611 (8th Cir. 2005), In re Arrol, 170 F.3d 934 (9th Cir.1999). [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
Sarda-Villa, 760 F.2d 1232, 1235 (11th Cir. 1985) ("[W]e are not willing to say that society is prepared to recognize a justifiable expectation of privacy solely on the basis of appellants' efforts to secret the contraband. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:14 pm
In re: Syncor Erisa Litigation, Pilkington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
., ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 927848 (3d Cir. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:03 pm
The rule departs from the MR by incorporating the current 3-100/6068(e) limits on the ability of counsel to disclose client information. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Lopez-Medina, 461 F.3d 724 (6th Cir. 2006). [read post]
