Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 6821 - 6840 of 29,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am by Giles Peaker
During these episodes she feels extremely low in mood and anxious.She does not seem to be depressed, and has good levels of self-care. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am by ACLU
States like Maine will be a haven for abortion access if Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am by Rob Robinson
Furthermore, the referring court has highlighted certain doubts relating, in essence, to the adequacy of the level of protection guaranteed by the United States with regard to the interferences by the United States intelligence authorities with the exercise of the fundamental rights of the individuals whose data are transferred to the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
In 1985, the Supreme Court decided that a police officer's use of a level of force that the Court deemed excessive--despite being authorized by state law and consistent with a rule going back to the common law and widely adopted by the states--was an "unreasonable seizure" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
An impeachment conviction does not result in a prison sentence, and the level of certainty required is rightly something less. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
But from definitions of income to exemptions to net operating losses, and even what filing statuses are available and whether a taxpayer can itemize their deductions, the federal tax code consistently informs state-level taxation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Whatever the Walter Nixon v. [read post]