Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6821 - 6840 of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Docket Navigator
Here, whatever her other shortcomings, [plaintiff's expert] grounds her analysis in the relative market shares of the parties, the DAS industry, the asserted patent, the parties’ profitability, competition between the parties, and [plaintiff's] unwillingness to relinquish market share. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 3:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to the incident, infant plaintiffs father was known to the defendant's police officers at the 43rd Precinct, having previously been arrested by them approximately six times for drunkenness, abusive and physical assault upon his family. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 6:51 am by Docket Navigator
Indeed, seven months after the Motion was filed, Plaintiffs can point to scarcely any lost sales at all, and have made no assertion that the amount of [plaintiff's] product sales in the hospitals referenced above have made any appreciable dent in [plaintiff's product's] market share. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
As such, the trial court requested the Superior Court to dismiss the Plaintiffs appeal. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the court dismissed a medical malpractice case as a sanction due to the Plaintiff's failure to abide by the discovery Orders of Court.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff sue medical defendants relative to treatment rendered to the Plaintiff's foot. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:47 am by Jon Gelman
Aaron’s, Inc., Civil No. 1:12-CV-0563-AT (N.D.Ga. 2013), 87 opt-in plaintiffs are suing their employer for, among other claims, not allowing certain lunch breaks as required by law. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:09 am by Michael C. Smith
Love Holding: Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTED In a relatively short opinion Judge Love concluded that in this one-defendant case the Defendant's location in the Eastern District of Wisconsin was "clearly more convenient" and ordered the case transferred. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:20 am by Michelle Yeary
  And “even if the warning label contained all of the information suggested by [plaintiffs] expert, he would still have prescribed the medication for [plaintiff]. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:12 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied in part defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's declaratory relief action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Arpert denied the plaintiffs motion to compel defendants to produce the plaintiff's electronically stored medical records in “native readable format” after the defendants produced the records in PDF format, agreeing that the defendants had demonstrated that they would suffer an undue burden in complying with the plaintiff's request. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
- eDiscovery TrendsPortions of Plaintiffs Motion to Compel eDiscovery Ruled as "Overbroad" and "Moot" Reaffirmed by District Court - eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Defendant’s Request for Deposition Regarding Plaintiffs Discovery Search Tools - eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:48 am by David Walk
The learned intermediary doctrine barred plaintiffs claim under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The jury entered a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff.On appeal, one of the Defendants argued that the trial court had erred in denying the Defendant’s Motion In Limine to preclude the Plaintiff from testifying at trial in contradiction to an allegation in the Plaintiffs Complaint.The Defendant asserted that in a paragraph of the Plaintiffs Complaint, the Plaintiff had asserted that he had been run over while trying to… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
On appeal, the trial court’s rulings were reversed in part, vacated in part, and the case was remanded. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm by Richard Goldfarb
The warranty of merchantability is a favorite tool of plaintiff's attorneys in food liability cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:48 am by Scott I. Unger
With regard to the same, the Court found that it could dissolve the corporation, Order the corporation to purchase the Plaintiff's stock or Order the Defendant himself to purchase the Plaintiff's stock. [read post]