Search for: "Read v. United States"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 30,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
This was the case even though the I-131 application states, “If you depart the United States before the Advance Parole Document is issued, your application for an Advance Parole Document will be considered abandoned. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
June 23, 2014), the United States Supreme Court refused to overturn the landmark decision Basic v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, 2012. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, 2012. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, 2012. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
United States, 603 U.S. ____ (2024), the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 – Read Judgment The Court of Appeal has upheld a challenge to a control order on the basis that the person subject to the order (‘the controllee’) had not been given sufficient information about the case against him. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:24 pm
" United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:14 am
On December 9, 2014, a unanimous United States Supreme Court answered that question – no. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:38 pm
In Laborers’ Local 265 Pension Fund v. iShares Trust, No. 13-6486, 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:01 am
On June 29, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:10 am
The only option would be to depart the United States, apply for a new visa, and return in the new or extended status. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
The trend appears largely, if not entirely, in cases against the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm
On Wednesday, January 13, the Supreme Court heard arguments in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:51 am
May 14, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of an event study as unreliable under Daubert v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:23 am
United States Army, 125 F.3d 1296, 1302 (9th Cir.1997); In re Grand Jury, 111 F.3d 1066, 1079 (3d Cir.1997); United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
The states make fairly similar arguments (interestingly also citing to NCAA v Alston a few times), but that's still helpful.A submission by Microsoft is perfectly complementary to the other filings because it shows that even another "Big Tech" company is profoundly concerned over, and negatively impacted by, Apple's conduct--and because of the arguments Microsoft's very well-crafted brief makes (this post continues below the document)22-01-27 Microsoft Acb… [read post]