Search for: "U.S. Direct Express"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 9,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 2:55 pm
Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651-52, 92 S. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
This was discussed in the Fifth Circuit panel opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Likewise, the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Additionally, the Commission reiterated that “foreign entities with U.S. customers must provide breach notification under U.S. laws. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm
Yesterday's opinions shed no light on who has the partial-birth cases from November because Sinochem was a January case and Lance was an unargued direct appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
TheNew York Times published an editorial earlier this month expressing its belief—and quoting leading constitutional scholar Larry Tribe of Harvard—that laws like the ones being discussed in New York and California should be upheld in court. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:35 pm
The Commission is organized under the authority of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:37 pm
The IRS accepts all major cards (American Express, Discover, MasterCard, or Visa). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am
Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 364-366 & n.8 (2010), regarding counsel’s failure to warn of the immigration consequences of a plea, had “abrogated the distinction between direct and collateral consequences and created a new framework for determining whether a consequence of conviction has a uniquely ‘close connection’ to the criminal process to require warnings under the right to counsel guaranties of the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 7:28 am
I have been directed to other studies concluding that the percentage is more like 55%.] [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:08 pm
Comm’n, 322 U.S. 335 (1944). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
” In this case, the Court held that the defendants were “unable to point to any express provision or necessary implication in the regulatory regime that would authorize or direct them to engage in the conduct they are alleged by the plaintiffs to have undertaken …” As such, like some of the other exemptions under the Competition Act, such as the collective bargaining exemptions under section 4 for unions and employers associations, it is not all conduct… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:09 am
How often do we consider whether we overuse U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:48 pm
Deputy U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:44 am
(©iStock) The express language of the CARES Act requires states to use these federal relief funds to help people, businesses, and local governments impacted by COVID-19. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:14 pm
The Dems conclude by walking back their demand somewhat that DEA deschedule marijuana altogether by expressing hope only that “DEA will not make the unprecedented choice to disagree with HHS’s medical finding that a drug does not belong in Schedule I. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am
Even the most unpopular ideas and expressions find refuge under the First Amendment’s umbrella. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:53 pm
Should you express your disagreement/anger through a boycott? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
The U.S Supreme Court has made it clear that governments may not restrict speech expressing ideas that offend, most recently in a unanimous 8-0 ruling on June 19, 2017, in Matal v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
The court stated: “Plaintiffs’ standards are vital to the advancement of scientific progress in the U.S. and exactly the type of expressive work that merits full protection under the Constitution and the Copyright Act. [read post]
