Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6821 - 6840 of 14,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2007, 5:25 pm
As acknowledged by the Court of Appeals in In re Forfeiture of United States Currency, "the Michigan forfeiture statute [MCL 333.7521(1)(f)] closely parallels the analogous federal statute, 21 USC 881(a)(6). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  One need look no further than the frequent tweets of the president of the United States to prove the point. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
With the current agreement between Israel and the United States is set to expire in 2017, Netanyahu sought an increase in annual aid from $3 billion to $4.5 billion. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:06 pm by Jessica Mendelson
” The report includes the major export enforcement, trade secret theft, economic espionage, and embargo-related criminal prosecutions handled by the United States Department of Justice between January 2007 and December 2012. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
United StatesDocket: 11-94Issue(s): Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles that this Court established in Apprendi v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Over the next 10 days, more than 145 representatives of Member States of the United Nations will invest 60 hours in deliberations, aiming for consensus on most provisions. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
  “They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 • The third trend --  the “partisanization” of state federalism -- closes the circle. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  While we believe the State had the ability to close the casino under state law, Michigan’s Attorney General felt the need to seek relief from the Supreme Court since no federal entity would step in and close the illegal Vanderbilt casino. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Although the court’s analysis of the prior restraint claim noted that regulation lacked a close nexus to expression, the court could have disposed of the case by reviewing it under United States v. [read post]