Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 9,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2008, 10:40 am
Gant, argued Tuesday in the Supremes. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:59 pm
Derived from the landmark United States Supreme Court ruling in the case of Miranda vs. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Charlie Crist to his Arizona estate. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 7:14 am
This followed on the heals of the Supreme Court case Bates v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:57 pm
It is widely anticipated that the ultimate resolution of the constitutionality of the PPACA will be made by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
The warnings stem from a well known United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:58 am
EPA, decided this last term, the Supreme Court invoked the major questions doctrine to reject EPA’s claim that the Clean Air Act granted it the authority effectively to require power plants to shift from generating electricity through coal to doing so through natural gas, wind, or solar sources. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
In Arizona v Youngblood, The United States Supreme Court held that the government's failure to preserve evidence only violates due process if the the defendant can show the government acted in bad faith. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
Our petition was denied last year after the SCOTUS ordered the state's response.This last summer, the Arizona Supreme Court reached the issue and held that aggravating a sentence based on a non-statutory "catch all" aggravator was "patently" vague. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Wal-Mart Class Action Case - Hartford lawyer Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Are Green Building RFPs More Important Than Contracts? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
For instance, yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 (with the three -- penned by Justice Ginsburg and joined by Justices Breyer and Sotmayor -- joining in a partial concurrence and partial dissent) that no Miranda warnings are required to a prison inmate brought to a prison interrogaton room without his request, to be interrogated by police about allegations or pre-incarceration crime, where the inmate was told he was not required to stay in the interrogation room. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:39 pm
Unless or until the Supreme Court decides that the provisions in question are unconstitutional, at which point I will so advise only if it makes any sense (after all, you wouldn't normally advise a client to go out and incur new debt just for fun, right before a filing; usually, it would not be sound advice). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
That makes them our first "Outrage of the Week"--our way of shining a light on the worst cases of companies distorting our political process under the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:35 pm
Fletcher of the Georgia Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:55 pm
The warnings stem from a well known United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:22 pm
The suit was filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, and it states that DMX (real name Earl Simmons) was not aware of the “fraudulent” acts of the company until last year, since he was already dealing with other, larger, legal problems of his own. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:23 am
Bennett, the Arizona public financing case pending before the Supreme Court, as well as book reviews by Ray LaRaja, Doug Chapin, and Louis DeSipio You can find a list of articles, with links to PDFs for electronic subscribers, here. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
.* The exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained by police who acted in objectively reasonable reliance upon K.S.A. 22-2501(c) prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
John's Journal of Legal Commentary 1-52 (2009).Mark Tushnet, Heller and the Critique of Judgment, 2008 Supreme Court Review 61-87.Symposium: Establishment and Fairness, 25 Constitutional Commentary 241-320 (2008). [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 4:12 am
” Landry’s executive order comes after the US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Arizona’s election law requiring proof of citizenship. [read post]
