Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 6841 - 6860 of 25,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:34 pm
The United States Department of Justice has received significant attention for its prosecutorial misconduct in the Ted Stevens prosecution - among many other cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 3:18 am by SHG
United States is its worst decision of my lifetime. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:58 pm by Jon Ibanez
In 2013, the United State Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm by John Floyd
This was made clear last July 24, 2023, when the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Retired United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor sat by designation with Circuit Judges Wiener and Stewart. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 1:39 pm by Steven Boutwell
The RMP Coalition consists of several affected industry trade groups, manufacturing groups, and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Town of Chester v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am by Kirk Jenkins
United States, which involved the question of whether fleeing from the police in a car was a violent felony, and Graham v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Planned Parenthood supporters It was 50 years ago today, the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case about contraception use by married couples that laid the groundwork for a constitutional “right to privacy” in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]