Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 6841 - 6860 of 25,651
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Importantly, the Report is the only publica­tion of its kind in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
Four subjects were involved with planned attacks in the United States inspired by or in support of the Islamic State. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:54 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States involves a question of whether the right to jury trial extends to the facts needed to impose a restitution fine. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:58 am by Hollis Wright
For example, for litigants bringing cases in United States Federal Districts Courts, the pleading standard requires that the complaint must set forth at least “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Nr 6 of the list, The EPO’s Vision (V) – Trust, was a sad display of what this principle meant to Battistelli: ‘… if trust is supposed to be the EPO’s vision, why does the EPO President apparently believe the EPO needs an “investigative unit” (aka as “Stasi” in examiners’ speech)? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
For a complete list, see Transforming Document Recordation at the United States Copyright Office, pp. 13-14 (2014). which is less complex than the registration system and which the Office began working on earlier. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States (98 U.S. 145,1878), the Supreme Court ruled against the Latter-day Saints. [read post]