Search for: "House v. State"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 25,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
This is the way the Justices put it in the 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Apparently lifelong Trekkie, Ted Moustakis, believed it was after being denied in case his against Christie’s auction house by the New York State Appellate Court for fraud and negligent misrepresenation. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Sunil V. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:44 pm
After a search of the applicant’s family house was conducted, the police indicated the applicant – and not his father – as a suspect. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:09 pm
Texas or Kansas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 am
Tunis reversed edition.The big case that made the paper was Arias v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:54 am
The Special Task Force shall consist of the following members, or their designees:(i) the Attorney General, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(ii) the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve as Co-Chair;(iii) the Secretary of State;(iv) the Secretary of Homeland Security;(v) the Director of National Intelligence;(vi) the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;(vii) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and(viii) other officers or full-time or permanent… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm
United States, the climate lawsuit brought by 21 youth plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:28 pm
Supreme Court struck down the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman under the federal Defense of Marriage Act in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Fowler v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:56 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:49 pm
Tomorrow in Permanent Mission of India v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
Random House, 35 USPQ2d 1547. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:18 pm
Woods v Harrington, Haverfordwest County Court. 19 May 2009. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
