Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 6841 - 6860 of 8,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 4:30 pm by Pamela Wolf
Federal and state law compliance-related issues may be confusing and challenging for employers. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:28 am
His Holiness whose latest encyclical, Caritas in veritate, states, at para 22: "Corruption and illegality are unfortunately evident in the conduct of the economic and political class in rich countries, both old and new, as well as in poor ones. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 am by James Hamilton
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals invited the SEC’s views of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements in the case of Slayton v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
”[3] The Code also requires that “if a food name is used in connection with the sale of a food (for example in the labelling), the sale is taken to be a sale of the food as the named food unless the context makes it clear that this is not the intention” (emphasis added).[4] Interestingly, one of the specific examples provided under this section states that if the context within which foods such as soy milk or soy ice cream are sold is indicated by use of the word… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am by Anna Christensen
Smith, who teaches criminal justice at Michigan State University. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Question: You quote Justice Tom Clark as saying that the power of assigning opinions is perhaps a Chief Justice’s “single most influential function,” which he labeled as an exercise in “judicial-political discretion. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
“Historically in the United States, LGBTQ+ people have been characterized and labeled as ‘depraved and violent,’ and lesbians, specifically, have been portrayed as ‘menacing social types,’“ Ms. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:58 am by Marx Sterbcow
The Plaintiffs contend the reason that PHH deleted this provision is due to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]