Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 9,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Thus, further notice by way of drug labels would not have altered the doctor’s conduct”); Formella v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
Wallace’s Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
(O’Donnell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
See, e.g., DeNeui v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:28 pm
By Daniel RichardsonChickanosky v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:12 pm
Citation: Hill v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:46 am
In Richard Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:21 am
To bolster its case, the state brought in a doctor who is an expert on Shaken Baby Syndrome. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This much was made clear by the case of Byrne v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:42 pm
TweetIn Hofferica v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:10 am
See Rader v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
So your doctor (20+ years later when these diseases manifest themselves) would X-ray you and tell you what form of the disease you had. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
So your doctor (20+ years later when these diseases manifest themselves) would X-ray you and tell you what form of the disease you had. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm
Many of these doctors worked in Kansas and Missouri, the states Bavley covered for the Star. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm
Sorrell, the Citizen Petition filed by the Medical Information Working Group asking FDA for clearer off-label regulations, and supplemental briefs filed in the pending Second Circuit appeal in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Daum v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:22 am
” Back when the law was created, an x-ray was state of the art imaging. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Curry v. [read post]
