Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 12,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am
They will consider legal doctrines, field research, and policy options. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
As stated by the Court of Appeals in Alejandro, this third requirement is also known as the prima facie case requirement. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
” Field preemption. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
From Alabama Gas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:39 am
Similarly, under field preemption, a state law is preempted if federal law so thoroughly occupies a legislative field to reasonably infer that “Congress left no room for the States to supplement it. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
This is a proceeding wherein the court is faced with the issue of whether or not its discretion as authorized in People v Kalin to deem a misdemeanor complaint charging a drug-related offense to be an information in the absence of a field test or laboratory analysis violate the defendant's constitutional right to due process. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:25 pm
However, in Damaso v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
BootsDeckers Outdoor Corporation v J.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
In Addington v Texas, the United States Supreme Court held that a civil commitment proceeding can in no sense be equated with a criminal proceeding. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Steven questioned whether there was a solution to this troublesome state of events. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
Previously, the state adhered to the Frye standard, which was established by the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:50 am
Pulse Entertainment Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
